853 IRS Officers Quit in a Decade: Tax Service Losing Its Soul?
Image credit X.com Finance Ministry
Nearly 9% of the Indian Revenue Service exited between 2014–24, raising urgent questions about faceless reforms, shrinking discretion, and policy sidelining.
By P. Sesh Kumar
New Delhi, December 22, 2025 — Over the decade from 2014 to 2024, a remarkable 853 Indian Revenue Service (IRS) officers-comprising both Income Tax and Customs & Indirect Taxes cadres are reported to have opted for voluntary retirement or resigned from service, a trend that has sent ripples through India’s tax administration architecture.
In the arc of modern Indian bureaucracy, the IRS once stood proudly as the nation’s elite tax cadre-experts in direct and indirect taxation, guardians of fiscal sovereignty, and indispensable cogs in revenue mobilization. Yet today, that pride is tinged with frustration.
Between 2014 and 2024, Parliament was informed that 853 IRS officers opted for voluntary retirement under the VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme)—
with 383 from the Income Tax wing and 470 from the Customs & Indirect Taxes wing laying down their batons rather than enduring the grind of the service. To put that number in perspective, the IRS cadre is not an insignificant outfit.
According to official records, the total cadre strength stood at around 9,775 officers, with approximately 4,192 in Income Tax and 5,583 in Customs & Indirect Taxes as of recent cadre statistics. That means over the decade nearly 9% of the entire cadre chose voluntary exit, a figure that should give policymakers pause.
Memorandum or Mirage: CAG–CBDT MoU and the Stakes for Tax Audit
Compare this with the intake of new officers: while precise recent annual recruitment figures for IRS are not centrally published in one place, what we do know from UPSC and academy reports is that classes graduating from the National Academy of Direct Taxes (NADT) often exceed 180–200 probationers in a year, reflecting the number of successful Civil Services Examination candidates allocated to IRS branches.
A December 2025 induction reported 182 IRS officers joining the service from one probation batch alone. If sustained each year, that reflects thousands of new entrants over a decade-a steady stream of talent flowing into the service.
But behind the numbers lies a gnawing discontent. The IRS officer’s job, once characterised by rich field experience and significant discretionary engagement with taxpayers, has transformed.
The adoption of faceless assessments, faceless appeals, and IT-based annual information returns (AIRs) has dramatically reduced personal interface with assessees. What once was considered the art of discretionary administration is now a digital treadmill of data points.
Officers feel their role has shifted from revenue guardians with judgment to revenue processors with targets. This reduction of informal discretion has struck at the heart of traditional tax administration culture.
Simultaneously, the pressure of ever-higher revenue targets compounds stress. Tax officials speak in hushed tones of the pressure to deliver collections that often overshadow nuanced adjudication, compliance facilitation, and taxpayer education.
While revenue collection is of course a pillar of public finance, the relentless push attached to it often leaves officers feeling like foot soldiers rather than thoughtful administrators. There is also the matter of policy influence.
In theory, the IRS is a central civil service cadre whose officers could shape tax policy through expertise and institutional memory. In practice, however, policy latitude is tightly held at the top, often in IAS hands or by shorttenured Chairs and Members of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (CBIC), many of whom don’t remain in a post for more than 18– 24 months.
This churn at the apex frequently relegates career IRS officers to implementer roles rather than strategic partners in tax policy formulation. Such constraints sap ambition and breed disillusionment.
For comparison, consider the IAS cadre—the administrative elite of India’s bureaucracy. Decades-long data suggest that attrition from IAS is a fraction of that in the IRS, with estimates of IAS/IPS departures over 30 years accounting for roughly 4.2% of the total cadre, much lower than the roughly 9% over just a decade seen in the IRS.
The contrast underscores a systemic trend: officers with policy influence and wider administrative authority (IAS) are less likely to exit than those whose scope has narrowed despite high expectations. The consequences of this silent exodus are far from abstract.
Experienced IRS officers are repositories of institutional knowledge. When they leave, they take with them nuanced skills in tax interpretation, litigation strategy, international tax diplomacy, and taxpayer engagement-capacities not easily replaced by new recruits fresh out of training academies.
The way forward must be multifaceted. First, restoring meaningful professional discretion where appropriate-complemented by accountability safeguards-can rekindle officers’ sense of purpose. Where faceless systems have eroded personal contact, hybrid frameworks that preserve efficiency but allow expert oversight could strike a better balance.
Second, institutionalising longer tenures for top policymakers in CBDT and CBIC would promote continuity and allow career IRS officers’ input to be woven into long-term strategic tax policy, rather than brief, revolving-door leadership stints.
Third, career development pathways that emphasise policy engagement and leadership-including secondments to academic or international tax bodies-can provide the intellectual engagement that many officers crave.
In the final analysis, the exodus of 853 IRS officers over a decade is more than a statisticit’s a clarion call. If India wants a robust, respected, and intellectually vibrant tax service that can meet the challenges of a digital economy and global tax competition, it must fix not just the recruitment pipeline but the deeper motivational architecture of the IRS itself.
Otherwise, the silent exits will keep coming-and with them, the erosion of institutional capability that India’s fiscal future cannot afford.
(This is an opinion piece. Views are personal)
Follow The Raisina Hills on WhatsApp, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, and LinkedIn
About The Author
