Wales’ Governance Failures Offer Lessons for India’s Civic Bodies

India’s CAG Reports Uncover Systemic Failures in Major Cities, Mirroring Ammanford Issues

By Sesh Kumar Pulipaka

New Delhi, April 27, 2025: India’s CAG reports on major municipal corporations reveal systemic failures, echoing issues in Ammanford, Wales. Delayed accounts, missing documents, and unexplained expenditures expose governance gaps on a massive scale.

The recent damning report by Audit Wales (Auditor General Adrian Crompton) into the affairs of Ammanford Town Council lifts the veil on what happens when local governance collapses under the weight of neglect, indifference, and disregard for basic financial prudence.

The saga bears uncomfortable resemblance to chronic issues unearthed in India’s own urban local bodies by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG). Both stories serve as a sobering reminder: financial discipline, transparency, and accountability are not mere bureaucratic niceties — they are the bedrock of public trust.

The Welsh town of Ammanford, picturesque in appearance, now finds itself mired in a governance scandal of its own making. Audit Wales, through its scathing investigation, has painted a portrait of municipal mismanagement that could easily serve as a cautionary tale for towns and cities across the world —including those in India, where municipal governance is often similarly fraught.

The findings against Ammanford Town Council are damning. For nearly a decade, the council failed to maintain even the most basic standards of financial record-keeping.

Required by law to prepare annual accounts and subject them to audit, the council instead neglected this duty, leaving almost £800,000 of taxpayer money unaccounted for over five years.

Proper and complete accounting records were nowhere to be found. Council members, when alerted to deficiencies by their internal auditor, collectively looked the other way, failing to recognize or respond.

Even draft audit findings in 2021 were disregarded, demonstrating a culture of apathy and abdication.

The council’s malaise ran deeper. The responsible financial officer went on extended leave and was eventually dismissed, yet the procedural lapses continued.

Accounts were not prepared or approved on time, and when finally tabled, lacked basic supporting documentation. The external auditor, forced to issue qualified opinions year after year, was unable to confirm the veracity of payments made or contracts awarded.

A particularly egregious episode involved the engagement of an accounting firm under unclear terms, with costs ultimately tripling the original estimate — without proper council approval or a transparent procurement process. Payments totalling thousands of pounds —including allowances, reimbursements, and third-party services — were made without documentation or clear authority, raising the spectre of misuse if not outright fraud.

The ultimate assessment is brutal: the council failed even the minimum standards required by its own Annual Governance Statement. It failed to act on warnings, failed to document decisions, and failed to protect the public purse.

Recommendations from Audit Wales are basic — maintain contract registers, ensure procurement rules are followed, and use official communication channels —underscoring just how rudimentary the lapses were.

For observers in India, the Welsh episode may evoke a sense of déjà vu. The CAG, in a series of recent reports on major municipal corporations — Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad — has flagged systemic failures that echo those found in Ammanford, only on a vastly larger and more consequential scale.

Year after year, the CAG has highlighted incomplete and delayed accounts, missing supporting documentation, and unexplained expenditures running into hundreds or even thousands of crores of rupees.

Unauthorised payments, diversion of earmarked funds, lack of transparency in awarding contracts, and shoddy maintenance of asset registers are recurrent themes. In the infamous 2018 CAG report on the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), for instance, auditors found that records of civic works worth thousands of crores were either missing or inadequately maintained, leading to rampant misclassification and possible leakage of public funds.

Similarly, Delhi’s municipal corporations have been rapped for poor collection of property tax, unsanctioned expenditures, and inadequate documentation of receipts and payments.

The core issue, whether in Ammanford or Ahmedabad, is the abysmal state of local government accountability. In both cases, internal red flags — whether from internal auditors or vigilant officials — were routinely ignored.

Councils and committees became echo chambers, failing to exercise oversight over those handling public money. Procurement processes —designed to safeguard value for money — were bypassed or manipulated, often benefiting select vendors or insiders.

Documentation, the lifeblood of accountability, became the first casualty, replaced by a culture of expedience and opacity.

Yet, there are important contrasts too. The audit ecosystem in India, though plagued by delays and capacity constraints, is arguably more robust in scope, with the CAG enjoying constitutional status and an expansive audit mandate.

While the Ammanford scandal involved hundreds of thousands of pounds, Indian municipal failures routinely imperil the fate of millions of urban residents and enormous sums.

Moreover, the aftermath in India is often more complicated, as local political patronage and weak follow-up mechanisms mean audit recommendations are not always acted upon.

So, what lessons emerge from this transcontinental comparison? First, the crisis of municipal accountability is universal — it is not confined to the Global South or to developing countries.

Second, the failure to maintain basic financial discipline at the local level erodes public trust more swiftly and permanently than any headline-grabbing scam at higher tiers.

Third, the solutions are not complex — timely preparation of accounts, transparent procurement, contract registers, and active council oversight — but they require a culture of accountability and a willingness to act on internal and external audit findings.

For India, as for Wales, the path forward is clear. Elected representatives and municipal officials must view audit not as a bureaucratic hurdle but as a vital safeguard for democracy and development.

Only then can the public be assured that the taxes they pay are spent with prudence, honesty, and purpose.

The Ammanford Town Council (in an ostensibly developed country) debacle serves as a clarion call for local governments everywhere. It is a story of the dangers of collective inaction, where warnings were ignored and systems allowed to decay.

India’s own urban governance must heed this warning. Whether the sums involved are in lakhs or crores, or the setting a small Welsh town or a vast Indian metropolis, the consequences of failed financial governance are ultimately borne by the ordinary citizen.

Audit is not the enemy — it is, and must remain, the vigilant friend of the public interest.

(This is an opinion piece; views expressed solely belong to the author)

Follow The Raisina Hills on WhatsApp, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, and LinkedIn

About The Author