India’s New Counter Terrorism Policy ‘PRAHAAR’ Explained
Assam Rifles apprehended active cadre of NSCN (IM) in Manipur in a joint operation in the general area Sawombung. Pix credit X @official_dgar
MHA Unveils PRAHAAR Counter Terrorism Policy; Strong on Jihadist Threats, Questions Remain on Insurgency Handling in Nagaland & Manipur
By NIRENDRA DEV
New Delhi, February 25, 2026 — In a decisive recalibration of India’s security doctrine, the PRAHAAR Counter Terrorism Policy was unveiled by the Union Ministry of Home Affairs on Tuesday — marking what officials describe as a more assertive and proactive national security roadmap.
Having significantly weakened Left-Wing Extremism over the past decade, the Government of India is now shifting focus toward eradicating terrorism and anti-India resistance networks through an integrated, intelligence-driven framework.
What Is PRAHAAR?
The new strategy titled PRAHAAR — an acronym — lays out a comprehensive seven-pillar counter-terrorism architecture: P – Prevention of terror attacks to protect Indian citizens and interests; R – Responses that are swift and proportionate; A – Aggregating internal capacities for whole-of-government synergy; H – Human rights and Rule of Law-based mitigation; A – Attenuating conditions enabling terrorism (including radicalisation); A – Aligning and shaping international counter-terror efforts; and R – Recovery and resilience via whole-of-society approach.
The Ministry reiterated India’s “zero tolerance” stance against terrorism in all its forms and manifestations.
Threat Profile: Expanding Beyond Conventional Terror
The document highlights: Cross-border jihadist networks; Global groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS; Drone-enabled attacks; Cyber tools and ICT misuse; and CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear) risks.
The strategy places renewed emphasis on intelligence-led disruption through the Multi Agency Centre (MAC) and coordinated task forces.
Enforcement Architecture: NSG, NIA & State ATS
Under PRAHAAR: Local police act as first responders; The National Security Guard (NSG) and state Counter Terror forces provide rapid reinforcement; The National Investigation Agency (NIA) leads investigations with a high-prosecution focus; Legal adherence is anchored in the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA); and updated criminal codes.
Capacity modernization through BPR&D training and standardized state-level anti-terror units is central to the plan.
Northeast Focus: Insurgency vs Terrorism — A Thin Line
While PRAHAAR’s framework targets cross-border terror modules, its application in India’s Northeast may prove more complex.
Groups such as: NSCN-IM, NSCN-K, and ULFA-I operate within a layered ecosystem of ethnic sovereignty demands, ceasefire arrangements and political negotiations.
Security upgrades for Assam Rifles along the Indo-Myanmar frontier, disruption of arms smuggling networks, and targeting parallel extortion economies in Nagaland and Manipur are expected to intensify.
However, enforcement must be calibrated alongside existing agreements like the NSCN-IM Framework Agreement and NNPG Agreed Position to avoid escalation.
Potential Gaps & Challenges
Despite its robust architecture, certain “blank areas” require closer review:
- Ethnic insurgency complexities – Jihadist frameworks may not fully address sovereignty-linked grievances.
- State Capacity Gaps – ATS units in Nagaland and Manipur lack parity with counterparts in Jammu & Kashmir.
- AFSPA Sensitivities – Enforcement without nuance could trigger political backlash.
- Illegal Arms & Terror Financing Networks – Persistent porous borders complicate monitoring.
Without tailored counter-insurgency methodologies distinct from counter-terror operations, tensions could rise in fragile regions.
Recovery & De-Radicalisation Push
PRAHAAR emphasizes: Community engagement, Prison de-radicalisation programs, Scholarships and socio-economic upliftment schemes, and Surrender and rehabilitation policies.
The objective: reduce recruitment pipelines among vulnerable youth in Naga and Meitei areas.
Assertive Doctrine, But Nuanced Execution Needed
India’s new security roadmap signals unmistakable intent: terrorism will be met with swift, coordinated, and legally grounded force.
Yet, as the country strengthens its counter-terror grid, policymakers must carefully distinguish between terrorism and insurgency — particularly in Nagaland and Manipur, where political resolution remains intertwined with security enforcement.
The PRAHAAR Counter Terrorism Policy may redefine India’s national security posture. Its long-term success, however, will depend on how well strength is balanced with sensitivity.
(This is an opinion piece. Views expressed are author’s own.)
Assam Rifles: From Guarding Borders to Grooming IAS Aspirants
Follow The Raisina Hills on WhatsApp, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, and LinkedIn
About The Author
