‘I Am a Thakur’: Viral Astha Singh HDFC Video Sparks Caste Storm
Astha Singh of HDFC Bank (Image video grab)
Astha Singh’s video statement challenges the one-sided narrative, exposing how social media outrage can outrun facts
By AMIT KUMAR
Lucknow, February 10, 2026 — A short, emotionally charged video clip can travel faster than truth—and the viral HDFC Bank controversy involving Astha Singh is a textbook case. Over the past 24–36 hours, a clipped video circulating on Instagram and other platforms projected Singh as a banker flaunting caste identity and allegedly misbehaving with a customer. The outrage was instant. The verdict, delivered online.
Now, Singh has issued a video statement contesting the narrative—and her account complicates the story in ways social media rarely accommodates.
What Astha Singh Says Actually Happened
According to Singh, the viral clip dates back to January 6 and does not involve a customer review or customer interaction at all. She claims the altercation was with the husband of a woman employed at the same bank, and that the video was misleadingly presented as customer abuse and weaponised as a caste issue.
Singh explains that the woman colleague had tendered her resignation and sought immediate relieving. On that day, the colleague’s sister-in-law allegedly sat inside the branch from morning, leading to a verbal exchange. Later in the evening—after working hours, Singh claims—the colleague’s husband entered the branch and allegedly abused and threatened her.
Her allegation is stark: She says she was directly asked about her caste and taunted—“Which caste are you from, and why are you so arrogant?”—followed by threats to “teach her a lesson” and ruin her career.
The Statement That Triggered the Firestorm
It was in this heated context, Singh admits, that she invoked her caste identity and said she was a Thakur—a remark that became the centrepiece of the viral outrage.
She concedes her choice of words was wrong and says she understands the responsibility that comes with a public-facing role. “I sit to serve the public. I should have chosen my words carefully,” she says.
But she also draws a line: provocation and threats, she argues, cannot be normalised or selectively ignored.
Singh maintains she stands by her identity statement—not as an act of discrimination, but as a reaction under duress. “I said I am a Thakur, and I still stand by it. I am proud of who I am,” she says, while insisting that pride does not equate to prejudice.
Social Media Trials vs Institutional Processes
The controversy exposes a familiar pattern: context collapse. A fragment of a confrontation, stripped of sequence and background, becomes a moral indictment. Employers, institutions, and individuals are pushed into defensive corners before facts are established.
Equally troubling is how quickly caste language—a raw and sensitive fault line in India—gets amplified into binary outrage: villain and victim, guilty and innocent. The possibility of mutual provocation, or a conflict escalating beyond professional boundaries, rarely survives the algorithm.
The Larger Question
This episode raises uncomfortable questions: Can workplace conflicts be adjudicated fairly once they go viral? Does acknowledging provocation excuse a problematic response—or merely explain it? And should identity assertions, however ill-timed, automatically be read as acts of discrimination?
As institutions investigate and social media continues to churn, one thing is clear: viral justice is rarely just. Due process, context, and proportion are often the first casualties.
Astha Singh’s statement does not close the debate—but it does puncture the illusion that the story had only one side.
(This is an opinion piece. Views expressed are author’s own.)
Follow The Raisina Hills on WhatsApp, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, and LinkedIn
About The Author
