Gensol-BluSmart Debacle: Anatomy of Vanishing Promoter Stake

Gensol-BluSmart Debacle: Auditors Must Stop Rubber-stamping and Demand Granular Evidence

By Sesh Kumar Pulipaka

New Delhi, April 18, 2025: The Gensol-BluSmart episode is not merely a cautionary tale for equity investors. It is a full-blown morality play on the dangers of unchecked ambition, regulatory loopholes, and systemic complacency.

What began as a modest SME listing in 2019 with 96 per cent promoter holding culminated in near-zero promoter equity by 2025, leaving in its wake a trail of misleading disclosures, phantom electric vehicle (EV) orders, fictitious financial documents, and a plant with barely any manufacturing activity.

This narrative dissects how the scam unfolded, the regulatory failures (SEBI, Audit Committees, Independent Directors, Statutory Auditors and CAG -yes CAG too) that enabled it, and the profound lessons it offers to India’s capital markets.

Let us explore how an ambitious startup leveraged the green energy narrative to mislead investors and regulators alike — until the music stopped.

A Green Beginning: The Rise of Gensol Engineering and the EV Promise

Gensol Engineering burst onto the public stage in September 2019 with a modest ₹18 crore SME IPO. It was not a head-turner — just 1.3 times subscribed. But it quietly laid the groundwork for a future replete with promise.

The promoters, Anmol and Puneet Jaggi, held an overwhelming 96 per cent stake, which was reduced to just over 70 per cent after listing. That dilution seemed normal. But what followed was anything but.

Over the next few years, Gensol rode the clean energy wave and the EV euphoria sweeping India’s markets. In July 2023, the company graduated to the mainboard — gaining access to broader investor pools and increased liquidity. Simultaneously, its subsidiary BluSmart grew in public visibility as a green cab aggregator powered by Gensol’s EV fleet. Beneath this eco-friendly image, however, lay layers of deception waiting to be peeled.

The Facade Unravels: From Pre-Orders to Phantom Plants

SEBI’s investigations began in June 2024, prompted by whistleblower complaints alleging price manipulation and fund diversion. What followed was a revelation of corporate deceit with cinematic audacity.

On January 28, 2025, Gensol told the stock exchanges it had received pre-orders for 30,000 EVs at the Bharat Mobility Global Expo. The news lifted expectations, but upon probing, the company admitted these were merely non-binding MOUs with nine entities — for 29,000 cars.

No payment terms. No delivery schedules. No guarantees. Just a wishful handshake dressed up as a committed order book.

An on-ground visit by an NSE official to Gensol’s so-called manufacturing plant in Chakan, Pune, sealed the suspicions. The facility was eerily quiet. Just 2-3 labourers were seen, and electricity bills showed laughably low consumption — ₹1.57 lakh in December 2024, implying negligible industrial activity. The EV dream began to dissolve into the fumes of corporate fiction.

A House of Cards: Strategic Deals, Dubious Subsidiaries, and Debt Shenanigans

The rot did not stop at fake pre-orders. In mid-January 2025, Gensol announced a “strategic tie-up” with Refex for the transfer of 2,997 EVs in exchange for Refex assuming ₹315 crore of Gensol’s loan liabilities. Just two months later, the deal was scrapped. In February, a fresh claim was made — Gensol had inked a ₹350 crore non-binding term sheet to sell its US subsidiary Scorpius Trackers, incorporated just six months earlier. When SEBI asked for a valuation basis, Gensol had no explanation.

This was not just poor governance. It was outright obfuscation. Rating agencies ICRA and CARE, smelling smoke, downgraded Gensol’s credit facilities to ‘D’ on March 3 and 4, 2025, citing delays in loan servicing.

The company responded with defiance, but soon SEBI would expose forged documents submitted to lenders IREDA and PFC to mask loan defaults.

IREDA and PFC had loaned ₹977.75 crore to Gensol, including ₹663.89 crore for the purchase of 6,400 EVs. When probed, Gensol admitted it bought only 4,704 EVs, costing ₹567.73 crore. That left ₹262.13 crore missing. The scam had moved beyond fibs into the realm of suspected fund siphoning.

How It Was Orchestrated: The Playbook of Deceit

At the heart of the scandal lies a three-pronged deception strategy. First came inflated and misleading disclosures — non-binding MoUs were passed off as firm orders to boost share prices.

Second, there were fake documents — “Conduct Letters” falsely attributed to IREDA and PFC to mask debt defaults. Third, the company engineered liquidity by steadily offloading promoter holdings to unsuspecting retail and institutional investors riding the EV hype.

By the time SEBI stepped in with an interim order banning the Jaggi brothers from holding key positions in listed companies, the promoters had almost completely exited their equity positions, leaving investors holding a story that no longer held up to scrutiny.

The Regulatory Blind Spots: What Didn’t Happen, But Should Have

Despite years of falsehoods, regulatory red flags failed to flutter early enough.

Where were the stock exchanges when Gensol made its exaggerated announcements? Why did the NSE’s surveillance mechanism not trigger alerts based on price and volume spikes following such disclosures?

Why were rating agencies reliant solely on documents provided by Gensol, without verifying directly with IREDA and PFC?

Why were auditors (CAG is the Government auditor as both IREDA and PFC are Central Public Sector Enterprises, and it conducts supplementary audit of the statutory auditors) and independent directors silent despite glaring discrepancies in procurement costs, financial statements, and capital deployment?

The SEBI action came only after a formal complaint was filed, suggesting a reactive—not proactive — regulatory posture.

The Lessons: What Stakeholders Must Learn from the Gensol Collapse

For investors, the lesson is brutal but clear — do not trust glossy green narratives without hard facts. ESG and EV-themed stocks need more scrutiny, not less.

For promoters, Gensol is a reminder that stock markets are not piggy banks to be milked. The paper trail will eventually lead to the truth, and when it does, consequences are inevitable.

For auditors (including CAG), CRAs, and exchanges, it is time to stop rubber-stamping disclosures and start demanding granular evidence. The financial system cannot run on trust alone — it must be built on verification.

And for SEBI, the wake-up call is urgent. This was a fraud hidden in plain sight, built over years. Surveillance systems must evolve to spot deception masked as growth—especially in high-buzz, low-regulation domains like EVs, green energy, and startups.

When the Green Turns Grey

Gensol’s unraveling is not just a story of regulatory failure — it is yet another warning shot to India’s capital markets. In the chase for growth and valuations, the system failed to catch a runaway narrative built on air. What’s worse, the promoters got away — selling their stake to an unsuspecting public under the guise of success. SEBI’s actions, though decisive in the end, came after most of the damage was done.

The hope is that this debacle serves as a watershed moment — where investor diligence, regulatory foresight, and institutional accountability converge to build a market less vulnerable to charm, and more loyal to truth.

(This is an opinion piece; views expressed solely belong to the author)

Join the WhatsApp Channel of The Raisina Hills

Follow on Google News https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqBwgKMNK2vwsw39HWAw?hl=en-IN&gl=IN&ceid=IN%3Aen

About The Author