Former Railways GM Lalit Chandra Trivedi says Alstom’s global execution troubles expose deeper risks in India’s rail and metro expansion, where timely delivery and localisation may matter more than aggressive bidding.
By TRH Infrastructure Desk
New Delhi, May 8, 2026 — Fresh concerns over French rail giant Alstom withdrawing its financial targets have sparked debate within India’s railway and metro ecosystem, with former railway executive Lalit Chandra Trivedi warning that the crisis exposes deeper structural risks in modern rail infrastructure projects.
In a detailed LinkedIn post, Trivedi argued that Alstom’s troubles are not simply a European business setback but a cautionary signal for India, where the company remains heavily involved in rolling stock, signalling systems, metro projects, and high-speed rail infrastructure.
According to Trivedi, the central issue confronting global rail projects is no longer demand but execution capability. India currently represents one of the world’s fastest-growing markets for rail and metro expansion, driven by projects such as Vande Bharat Express manufacturing, Regional Rapid Transit Systems, metro expansion in Tier-2 cities, and high-speed corridors.
However, he warned that large engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contracts have become “execution-risk driven businesses,” where delays in delivery, certification, and cost overruns can significantly erode profitability.
Trivedi highlighted homologation and localisation challenges as emerging pressure points for India’s rail sector. He pointed to increasingly complex approval systems involving bodies such as the Research Designs and Standards Organisation, the Commissioner of Railway Safety, and Independent Safety Assessors for indigenous signalling systems like KAVACH.
He also said “Make in India” localisation requirements and gaps in vendor ecosystem maturity could intensify operational stress for global manufacturers.
Another major concern raised was the long-term impact of aggressive bidding practices. Trivedi cited the “Aventra effect” linked to legacy Bombardier contracts, arguing that low-margin bids often conceal financial risks that surface years later during execution and maintenance phases.
The warning comes as India increasingly adopts PPP-based procurement models, long-term maintenance-linked contracts, and Design-Build-Maintain frameworks in rail infrastructure.
Despite the risks, Trivedi said the situation could create opportunities for domestic manufacturers and integrators, including BHEL, Titagarh Rail Systems, and the broader Medha ecosystem, to strengthen local supply chains and execution capabilities.
He concluded that India’s next phase of railway growth will depend less on who wins bids and more on who can consistently execute complex projects on time and within cost.
Follow The Raisina Hills on WhatsApp, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, and LinkedIn
